Re: tokens as input to modifiers

On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 03:44:20PM -0700, boots wrote:
> > --- messju mohr <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > i think it's intended. "null" or "true" could be registered
> > > functions which makes the above valid syntax. allowing "null" and
> > > "true" as constants would make it ambiguous.
> 
> Sorry for the multiple emails, but I just had another thought. Where is
> the logic in allowing function plugin names that are already used as
> tokens within the parser? Particularly for things like "null", "true",
> etc ?

i think, it's the same logic that allows
$smarty->assign("@$\0\n", $value) even if the $value may be hardly
reachable from the template.

simply not checking is the fastest type of check. :)

> xo boots 

-- 
Smarty Development Mailing List (http://smarty.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php