Re: Re: Running more PHP-versions with php_opcache.dll

Jan Ehrhardt <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.php.windows
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Pierre,

Pierre Joye in php.windows (Tue, 9 Jul 2013 22:39:17 +0200):
>On Jul 9, 2013 7:54 PM, "Jan Ehrhardt" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> For what purpose should I use two php.ini's?
>
>For having two different settings for x86 and x64. Which is what your patch
>does. You already have two different DLLs.

O, yes. For that purpose I have different php.ini's.

>I do not understand why you build everything from scratch. Providing the
>missing ext should be enough. Also we work with everyone to be sure that we
>are all sync'ed from a VC version POV. There should not be a need to
>provide custom build for php itself. But that's another discussion.

It started with something PHP.net did not deliver: x64 versions of PHP
5.3 and 5.4. And for me it is the easiest way to keep up-to-date. A
single build script for all extensions, with a direct check if they
load. But you are right: that is another discussion.

>> At the moment I am uploading new x64-zip's, containing a php_opcache.dll
>> (from the unmodified GIT-head sources) and a php_opcache64.dll that is
>> using a differently named semaphore file.
>
>Yes, that is IMO a bug. The filename is poorly generated and should used
>less conflicting inputs.

Steffen from Apachelounge said something interesting:
"Opcache is creating in his temp dir ...."
http://www.apachelounge.com/viewtopic.php?t=5461
Is there something as a temp dir setting for OPcache?

Jan

-- 
PHP Windows Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.