Re: [zi-dev] build infos in package and application XML
"Christian Zonsius (ZZ/OSS)" <[email protected]> Sat, 27 Mar 2004 15:40:26 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.php.zzoss.installer.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
hi, >Now imagine, someone is wrapping up phpMyAdmin version 2.5.6. to be installed >with the ZZ/OSS Installer Client. This version has been release 01-03-2004, >hence we would write in the package or application XML: > ><release> > <version>2.5.6</version> > <date>01-03-2004</date> ></release> > >If the ZIC bundle of phpMyAdmin has not been issued by the phpMyAdmin team, >but by a third party, it would be interesting to now, when the bundle has >been created, thus I would suggest an additional <bundled> element: > ><release> > <version>2.5.6</version> > <date>01-03-2004</date> > <bundled>21-03-2004</date> ></release> you are right. a release date of an application might not be equal to the release date of the corresponding bundle. ><release> > <version>2.5.6</version> > <date>01-03-2004</date> > <notes>Fixed: ... Bugs: ...</notes> ></release> ><bundle> > <version>20040301-2</version> > <date>01-03-2004</date> > <notes> > The package was not correctly bundled, a file was > not specified in the filelist > </notes> ></bundle> ><changelog> > <release>...</release> > <bundle>...</bundle> ></changelog> IMHO, this approach seems to me the better one. what happens, if the package.xml / application.xml doesn't contain a <bundle> element ? does the installer automatically use the <release> information (date, etc..) for bundle data ? christian ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click