Re: wxWindows-2.3.4

Stefan Neis wrote:

>On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Ken Ames wrote:
>
>  
>
>>well, another release that won't build. bombs out on the first file it 
>>tries to compile. This and what errors I had building 2.3.3 seem like 
>>things that would or should be handled way before any release is thought 
>>of. I hope it gets fixed soon.
>>
>>        copy "X:\WXWINDOWS-2.3.4"\include\wx\os2\setup.h 
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>"X:\WXWINDOWS-2.3.4"\include\wx\setup.h
>>        1 file(s) copied.
>>
>>X:\WXWINDOWS-2.3.4\include\wx\chkconf.h(100:9) : error EDC3086: 
>>"wxUSE_PROLOGIOmust be defined."
>>X:\WXWINDOWS-2.3.4\include\wx\chkconf.h(1189:9) : error EDC3086: "wxr 
>>resources require PrologIO"
>>NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'G:\OS2\CMD.EXE' : return code '12'
>>Stop.
>>    
>>
>
>Sh*t!
>We don't start from the "raw"distribution often enough, it seems.
>"setup.h" (the one you copied above) needs to include the extra
>line
>
I didn't copy it, the makefile did that. or something did cuz I was 
following the readme.os2 and did a "nmake all -f makefile.va" which I 
just did a cut/paste from the readme.  sorry if I sounded nasty in my 
last post, I had a really rotten day. my apologies to all.

>#define wxUSE_PROLOGIO 1
>It's somewhat amazing that it ever build without it, until there's been
>a consistency check which flags it as an error when it's not defined...
>
>	Thanks for finding and reporting,
>		Stefan
>
>P.S.: wx-dev-/yE4lDbqgNum/[email protected] might be slightly more appropriate for
>	such stuff (and it would also make realize others that OS/2
>	actually does exist).
>
Ken

>  
>