Re: Ghostrscript/GhostPDL 9.18 Release Candidate 1
Johannes Meixner <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.printing.ghostscript.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello, On Sep 24 15:03 Chris Liddell wrote (excerpt): > I believe: > http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=1ae85e68 > fixes the issue. I noticed the new bug report http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696223 and that it has something to do with "--disable-compile-inits". When I became maintainer of the ghostscript package in SUSE I inherited "--disable-compile-inits" from the past. I do not know why that is used because by default it is not used according to ghostscript-9.18rc1/doc/Make.htm#Precompiled_data Furthermore this documentation seems to indicate that it is better not to use "--disable-compile-inits" because when it is not used it "simplifies installation, improves security, may reduce memory requirements". Accordingly I have now removed "--disable-compile-inits" from our configure switches which makes it also working. I really want to have the SUSE/openSUSE Ghostscript as much as possible in compliance with upstream. Therefore I would like to get a recommendation if we (i.e. SUSE/openSUSE) should continue using "--disable-compile-inits" or if we should better drop it. Mainly I wonder if it could be perhaps needed for this or that special use case that the initialization files are not compiled into the executable? In general I would appreciate very much recommendations what configure options are considered by upstream Ghostscript to be "the right ones" so that a Linux distribution would provide Ghostscript to their users that works as much as possible in compliance with upstream. Kind Regards Johannes Meixner -- SUSE LINUX GmbH - GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton - HRB 21284 (AG Nuernberg)