Re: Ghostscript and GhostPDL 9.20 release

Chris Liddell <[email protected]> Tue, 27 Sep 2016 22:13:48 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.printing.ghostscript.devel
Message-ID <CAGy8pWpTZGWQrAhKXZ2eWcOkkNDTkozrU6Cp8H+QwP6UBJTJ+w@mail.gmail.com>
On 27 September 2016 at 20:23, Andreas Radke <[email protected]> wrote:
>   cd ghostscript-${pkgver}
>
>   # force it to use system-libs
>   # keep heavily patched included openjpeg, leads to segfault with system openjpeg
>   # https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/38226
>   rm -rf jpeg zlib jasper  tiff lcms lcms2 freetype cups/libs jbig2dec
>   # http://ghostscript.com/pipermail/gs-devel/2016-September/009918.html
>   # libpng expat
>
>   autoconf --force
>
>   ./configure --prefix=/usr \
>         --enable-dynamic \
>         --with-ijs \
>         --with-jbig2dec \
>         --with-omni \
>         --with-x \
>         --with-drivers=ALL\
>         --with-fontpath=/usr/share/fonts/Type1:/usr/share/fonts \
>         --enable-fontconfig \
>         --enable-freetype \
>         --enable-openjpeg \
>         --without-luratech \
>         --without-omni \
>         --with-system-libtiff \
>         --with-libpaper \
>         --disable-compile-inits # needed for linking with system-zlib
>   make so
>   make

Is it your intention to build more than Ghostscript? The GhostPCL and
GhostXPS products really haven't had any testing as a) shared
libraries and b) using the system shared library dependencies. So both
are much more likely to fail than Ghostscript.

I really don't know what the problem might be, and I won't have time
to look at it for a few days, maybe a week - I'm travelling for the
rest of this week.

So please do open a bug, and make sure it gets assigned to me, so I
don't forget.

Parenthetically, there are some pointless options there, like
"--with-omni" *and* "--without-omni"? "--with-libpaper",
"--enable-fontconfig", "--enable-freetype", "--enable-openjpeg",
"--without-luratech", "--with-jbig2dec" and "--with-x" are all the
defaults.

Chris