Re: Ghostscript/GhostPDL 9.22 Release Candidate 1
William Bader <[email protected]> Tue, 19 Sep 2017 13:08:26 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.printing.ghostscript.devel,gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CO2PR15MB0092BFF53751AC482B5A7EEDC4600@CO2PR15MB0092.namprd15.prod.outlook.com> |
>Then maybe you should complain to the software producing that content. That is one place where TeX shows its age, and switching to a newer system like SILE might produce better output https://github.com/simoncozens/sile https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BIP_N9qQm4 William ________________________________ From: gs-devel <[email protected]> on behalf of Ken Sharp <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 4:38 AM To: David Kastrup Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [gs-devel] Ghostscript/GhostPDL 9.22 Release Candidate 1 At 20:38 18/09/2017 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >I think "slightly smaller" was something like a factor of 10. We are >talking about files including literally thousands if not ten thousands >of graphics (manuals close to a thousand pages with lots of graphic >output included). Then maybe you should complain to the software producing that content. I already said I would discuss this further, berating me will not induce me to make changes. Ken