Re: Asking help for preview-latex
Ikumi Keita <[email protected]> Sat, 22 Jun 2019 21:35:49 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.printing.ghostscript.devel,gmane.emacs.auctex.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1706.1561206949@localhost> |
Hi Ken, >>>>> Ken Sharp <[email protected]> writes: > At the moment, I cannot see any way to achieve this. What you are > doing with the PDF interpreter is pretty much exactly the sort of > thing we have spent time preventing. We really don't want people to be > able to modify the PDF interpreter at all. Thank you for your detailed explanation. I realize it is almost hopeless to achive our original intent by just replacing the existing Postscript code. I'm a bit surprised since adjusting the background color of the generated image to that of emacs still works under gs-9.27. Perhaps it might be a loophole left in gs-9.27 and we possibly have to be prepared that the future Ghostscript disables this feature as well. > Is it not possible to alter the production of the PDF file in the > first place ? I'm not currently sure, but I'll propose other AUCTeX developers that idea. Thank you very much Ken, I appreciate your effort provided for us. Regards, Ikumi Keita