Re: outputFile support in bbox device
"Igor V. Melichev" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.printing.ghostscript.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> From: "Alex Cherepanov" <[email protected]> > To: "Igor V. Melichev" <[email protected]> > Cc: "gs-code-review" <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 5:48 PM > Subject: Re: outputFile support in bbox device > Igor V. Melichev wrote: > > > Please explain more about this patch : > > > > 1. Why don't use stderr redirection in command line instead implementing the > > new feature ? > Microsoft command processors cannot redirect stderr to a pipe. gs in.ps 2>stderr.txt does redirect on Windows NT, 2000, XP. I never tried it on Windows 95, 98. Can you do that ? > > 2. With the new feature, what happens if the target device of the bbox > > device handles -dOutputFile ? > I didn't think about it. OutputFile processing can be disabled when > there is a target device. I'm not sure the the desabling is a right resolution. The target device may need an output file. Igor.