Re: An indeterminizm in GS_8_1X

Ralph Giles <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.printing.ghostscript.patches
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 09:00:25PM +0300, Igor V. Melichev wrote:

> The patch
> http://www.ghostscript.com/pipermail/gs-cvs/2003-December/003923.html
> probably should be committed to GS_8_1X.
> See log message in there.
> 
> Another patch 
> http://www.ghostscript.com/pipermail/gs-cvs/2003-December/003924.html
> should be pretty safe and useful.

These both look good to be to go into 8.14. Please commit them to the GS_8_1X branch.

Also, could you please prepare a cleaned up version of 
http://www.ghostscript.com/pipermail/gs-cvs/2003-December/003927.html

I understand this is the fix in head for the -dTextAlphaBits=4 assert failure that is the 
motivation for the 8.14 release. However, the commented out 'if' clause is not up to our usual 
standards for stable release code. I'd really appreciate it if you'd take the time to trace 
through this and see why the path behavior is not set as you expect.

Thanks,
 -r
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.