Re: [Bug 687317] New: EncryptionR=2 doesn't work withPermissions=-44
"Igor V. Melichev" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.printing.ghostscript.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I agree that the check in incorrect. However the patch is incomplete. It must fix the default value in gdevpdf.c ln 206 . Probably GS_8_1X to be patched as well. Igor. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Russell Lang" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 10:43 AM Subject: [gs-code-review] [Bug 687317] New: EncryptionR=2 doesn't work withPermissions=-44 > Log message: > Fix pdfwrite allowable Permissions for EncryptionR=2. > > DETAILS: > The code was assuming that the extra permissions should be 0's, > when in fact they should be 1's. The fixed code is a bit more > conservative and requires that all reserved bits match the PDF > specification. > > diff -u -r1.89 gdevpdf.c > --- a/gdevpdf.c 13 Feb 2004 08:08:35 -0000 1.89 > +++ b/gdevpdf.c 25 Feb 2004 03:33:54 -0000 > @@ -545,7 +545,8 @@ > eprintf("PDF encryption key length must be a multiple of 8.\n"); > return_error(gs_error_rangecheck); > } > - if (pdev->EncryptionR == 2 && (pdev->Permissions & (0xF << 8))) { > + if (pdev->EncryptionR == 2 && > + ((pdev->Permissions & (0xFFFFFFC3)) != 0xFFFFFFC0)) { > eprintf("Some of Permissions are not allowed with R=2.\n"); > return_error(gs_error_rangecheck); > } > Russell Lang [email protected] > Ghostgum Software Pty Ltd http://www.ghostgum.com.au/ > > > _______________________________________________ > gs-code-review mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.ghostscript.com/mailman/listinfo/gs-code-review >