Re: Suggested patch for cet 16-08
"Igor V. Melichev" <[email protected]> Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:24:57 +0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.printing.ghostscript.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Raph, I think it's fine to commit if no regressions. Igor. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Raph Levien" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 9:39 AM Subject: [gs-code-review] Suggested patch for cet 16-08 > The diffs in test 16-08 are caused by Ghostscript using the name > ".OrigFont", while Adobe uses simply "OrigFont." The attached patch > changes the name, but I want to run it by people to see if it's going > to break something stupid, before just committing it. I also need to > run some regressions. > > Raph > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > gs-code-review mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.ghostscript.com/mailman/listinfo/gs-code-review >