all devices regression report - 2017-10-13-04:14:31 - 05432a551f887d7526b2bf3c65f3f1740cb3cc48

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.printing.ghostscript.regression
Message-ID <20171013111432.31D7220401E9@i7>
Differences in all devices errors using gs/examples files

Previous Revision: 9196c7ff8c41f1b256d58696158cd6b99e238459
 Current Revision: 05432a551f887d7526b2bf3c65f3f1740cb3cc48

commit 05432a551f887d7526b2bf3c65f3f1740cb3cc48
Author:     Ken Sharp <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Fri Oct 13 11:16:40 2017 +0100
CommitDate: Fri Oct 13 11:16:40 2017 +0100

    PDF interpreter - Improve annotation appearance generation
    
    Bug #698627 "PDF 2.0 tests Polygon annotation"
    Bug #698629 "PDF 2.0 tests Polyline annotation"
    Bug #698630 "PDF 2.0 tests Ink annotation"
    
    This commit refactors the code previously committed for Circle and
    Square annotations to make it more general. Adds support for the Polygon,
    PolyLine and Ink with /Path array (new to PDF 2.0). Adds support for
    transparency in Annotations (some limited support was available before).
    Adds the /Line annotation type and implements the Line Ending (/LE)
    array, but not other aspects of the Line annotation (these may be added
    at a later date).
    
    Bug #698628 "PDF 2.0 tests Redact annotation"
    
    We specifically don't generate an Appearance for Redact annotations, but
    will render one if supplied. This annotation is really an interactive
    feature, not relevant to print.
    
    Predictably this commit causes differences as we now generate substitute
    appearances for more annotation types when the appearance is missing.

Resource/Init/pdf_draw.ps
Resource/Init/pdf_main.ps

new errors:

errors that went away:

errors that are not whitelisted:
=== ghostpdl/examples/transparency_example.ps === cp50 ===
=== ghostpdl/examples/transparency_example.ps === psdrgb ===
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.