all devices regression report - 2017-10-20-16:43:56 - 6495e38f2dbaeedcaedf84f15c96e78aab6773c4

[email protected] Fri, 20 Oct 2017 16:43:56 -0700 (PDT)

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.printing.ghostscript.regression
Message-ID	<20171020234356.611ED20401E8@i7>

Differences in all devices errors using gs/examples files

Previous Revision: 9e8d2e156aa3ea039f531e6ea378add4ea6e268c
 Current Revision: 6495e38f2dbaeedcaedf84f15c96e78aab6773c4

commit 6495e38f2dbaeedcaedf84f15c96e78aab6773c4
Author:     Ray Johnston <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Fri Oct 20 14:40:21 2017 -0700
CommitDate: Fri Oct 20 14:40:21 2017 -0700

    Remove useless test in PDF interpreter transparency code
    
    This test was always true since we always have .begintransparencygroup
    It was changed in 2008 from a check for .inittransparencymask which was
    created back in 2006. It was probably a test in case the PDF interpreter
    was running on a system that may not include the pdf14 compositor, but
    that is only a guess.

Resource/Init/pdf_ops.ps

new errors:

errors that went away:

errors that are not whitelisted:
=== ghostpdl/examples/transparency_example.ps === cp50 ===
=== ghostpdl/examples/transparency_example.ps === psdrgb ===