Re: groff 1.24 release goals and gates

Collin Funk <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.printing.groff.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
"G. Branden Robinson" <[email protected]> writes:

> Hi Peter,
>
> At 2025-11-15T15:00:29-0500, Peter Schaffter wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 15, 2025, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
>> > I think groff 1.24.0.rc1 is finally coming into view.
>> 
>> Just the release candidate, or the actual release?
>
> Just the release candidate; I don't have the courage to push a final
> release with _no_ release candidates, and we haven't had any for 1.24.
>
> That said, if RC1 is well received and raises no issues demanding a code
> change, I see no reason not to go to final release after that.  (That's
> kind of my definition of a "release candidate"--if it builds and runs
> and no defects arise warranting code changes, it's a successful
> "candidate".)
>
> What I took away from the 1.22.4 and 1.23.0 release cycles shows was
> that 2 weeks is about as long as we need for RC feedback.  I remember
> being frustrated that holding the RC window open for a third week didn't
> seem to accomplish much.
>
> It's my first time doing this officially for groff, of course.  I'm open
> to feedback or suggestions about release management.

For Coreutils, Pádraig usually does a release snapshot around a week
before the planned release to allow people to test [1].

Sometimes it goes well and can be released early. Other times it needs a
few more snapshots due to unforeseen bugs.

Just figured I would share in case you want to try something similar,
using [email protected].

Collin

[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/platform-testers/2025-11/msg00000.html
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.