Re: typesetting.{mom,pdf} and the groff build system (was: proposed "headline" items for groff 1.24.0)

At 2026-01-30T16:09:41-0500, Peter Schaffter wrote:
> > At 2026-01-30T12:44:35-0500, Peter Schaffter wrote:
> > > typesetting.mom uses N and P for variety (demonstrating families),
> > > but where either is used, T is an acceptable substitute.  There's
> > > no reason to use H as the replacement.  With trivial tweaks, both
> > > the original and the Times Roman versions produce identical
> > > layouts.
> 
> Rather than patching typesetting.mom directly, I'm attaching a
> revised version, which should fix the font/foundry problems.
> Please inspect.  If all looks good, I'll commit the patch.

FYI, your new version of the file changes its encoding from UTF-8 to
Latin-1 (or maybe this was an artifact of your mailer attaching it?),
which makes the Emacs 'coding' tag on the first line inaccurate.  Was
this a deliberate change?  I can convert it back and commit it with you
as --author if you'd like.

Apart from that, the changes look 100% fine to me.

Regards,
Branden

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=eMzb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----