Re: how many font descriptions should be in font/devpdf? (was: typesetting.{mom, pdf} and the groff build system "headline" items for groff 1.24.0)
Dave Kemper <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.printing.groff.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACRhBXMOw4nnWSh1jx2wj8XVAO7Tii3bNoqTo45rGe_ZS9XxFQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Feb 6, 2026 at 5:10 AM G. Branden Robinson <[email protected]> wrote: > weird/stupid things [...] can occur if a directory is used for an > out-of-tree build after having been once used for an in-tree build I'll re-ask an unanswered question from Ingo from a couple weeks ago (http://lists.gnu.org/r/groff/2026-01/msg00078.html): "Given that you prefer out-of-tree, that it is objectively cleaner and better tested, why is in-tree even supported at all? Simply deleting the code supporting in-tree and making all builds out-of-tree naively looks like a win for everyone: less maintenance and testing effort for you and more cleanliness and better testing for the benefit of users." The "weird/stupid things" cited above are a real-world example of Ingo's point about "more cleanliness."