Re: [chem] more on bonds and arrows
Norwid Behrnd <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.printing.groff.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <kFDjt5gNKdbVUyqRGrljZ_J9Hmc9WMHSiDkYDYmrVfNPvyiwmyudrxLGxMq8fFh0gY-c6rDGqmw9Tw_lG8FLlNeg5L43Qbf5ef1RuzWAL-k=@protonmail.com> |
Dear Hans On Thursday, February 5th, 2026 at 09:44, "[email protected]" via GNU roff typesetting system discussion <[email protected]> wrote: > Long overdue, but I've made some adjustments. > > I think it solves the issue when using 'put Mol at N' in ring structures. > > Norwid would you be so kind to check if this is the case? > Right now, I do not remember what the «issue when using 'put Mol at N' in ring structures» was, or is; perhaps because the discussion about additions to chem's functionality started in summer/fall 2025, then paused. Can you please help me with a prompt, some additional detail (either here, or to my email) about context around 'put Mol at N'? Some background from my side: With functionality provided by chem in groff 1.23.0 packaged for Linux Debian, during December 2025/January 2026, examples outside the folder about CSTR #122 were revised. The edits became part of groff's commit history. My contributions paused to ease the eventual publication of groff 1.24.0 which in turn could include results of [your work] when suitable (i.e., groff 1.25.0). [your work]: https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?67929