Re: Fwd: Re: There is a severe problem with EQN and square roots

"G. Branden Robinson" <[email protected]> Mon, 2 Mar 2026 20:05:48 -0600

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.printing.groff.general
Message-ID	<20260303020548.g2gdpx6eorqvsizi@illithid>

At 2026-03-03T03:02:40+0100, onf wrote:
> In neatroff, \N takes the glyph name as defined by the font rather
> than its numeric ID (e.g. \N'radicalbt') which makes using \N for
> this portable across all fonts with the same naming scheme

Isn't that what `\C'radicalbt'` is for?  With the same qualification?

Regards,
Branden

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Xq8E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----