Re: Syntax errors in makeindex.1
"G. Branden Robinson" <[email protected]> Sat, 18 Apr 2026 21:41:26 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.tex.tex-k,gmane.comp.printing.groff.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20260419024126.pjq4krtif7tzzcfd@illithid> |
Hi Karl & Hilmar, At 2026-04-13T00:39:42-0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > ...I can add a sentence to the discussion of `\f` escape sequences > like the following. > > \fB, \fI, \fR, \fP > ... > Only the escape sequences shown are dependable. > Others, such as \fC, are not portable, meaningless on > terminal devices, and can prompt warnings from GNU > troff(1). > > ...something like that, maybe? `\fC` is worth calling out > specifically since it's shockingly popular for a specimen of > ineffectual syntax. I've committed a change similar to this to groff Git. You can expect it in the next groff release, tentatively scheduled for early July. Regards, Branden
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEh3PWHWjjDgcrENwa0Z6cfXEmbc4FAmnkQM8ACgkQ0Z6cfXEm bc7gIQ//crksjIdPGe/GQFEQYlG/MR8j9ifwpp1PaZcyXnZZKTjY2U1AohJDUF/m 3JaWrIHCjWc9BFBde8GqwlD2v+mNcvqEbRE0bEwVxwUPksiRBabdaTz/zn7dJwmT mETR95XeBS/AT/Ar+etb61vYRB2IpI+LUoGPIppDJpzOl9HSgMRV5g2G69CjCITe 9gHcACISxXxuZKcQDm/9tdUwV13ZveoedQWqUNeLUFe2edEky+hDPMhODLgVshL0 s8RIH0MxqaeV/mGEV5n1wECjRx8KhDu5yTl2JYz4RSM7Ye4qaIA7wabNwK6JFtX7 vOxmpE49T7RmELYZyIPXEpAQF8JZpBB22/yFW5fNqQHJTB7QjA6+4RYIkz/bxAcE sgsXdVuLUg66oacnKEFqBJholtSOWk41+/KBYy914iKTwPbhglFGybBTjNa5BOlf utQruFcR2Dxwhw0jeoOJJNckxD2tfP52dh2CiFB5cdqep6P+y2fganMxpmsaiYdK rxj8NVuOyho5BlTxQrxq3Uo15Bu4R8NkJpUDDB9wvts6xA+SJyHwe/CPQ/EAALfn rCqoYXFr3G0Op06s4QlyOfxmHfj83xRsytbLMrpDnxgRUM7yrlF5tW1KNc6pHZ2Z BMhdGiN/YlyAndX9vVVc33xhyvRqmpm4VzzA1eGoGNC8navIqFM= =34Rv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----