Re: Syntax errors in makeindex.1

"G. Branden Robinson" <[email protected]> Sat, 18 Apr 2026 21:41:26 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.tex.tex-k,gmane.comp.printing.groff.general
Message-ID <20260419024126.pjq4krtif7tzzcfd@illithid>
Hi Karl & Hilmar,

At 2026-04-13T00:39:42-0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> ...I can add a sentence to the discussion of `\f` escape sequences
> like the following.
> 
>      \fB, \fI, \fR, \fP
> ...
>                Only the escape sequences shown are dependable.
>                Others, such as \fC, are not portable, meaningless on
>                terminal devices, and can prompt warnings from GNU
>                troff(1).
> 
> ...something like that, maybe?  `\fC` is worth calling out
> specifically since it's shockingly popular for a specimen of
> ineffectual syntax.

I've committed a change similar to this to groff Git.  You can expect it
in the next groff release, tentatively scheduled for early July.

Regards,
Branden
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=34Rv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----