Re: More on AOP for .NET
"Corpening, Owen" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.aspect.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
My apologies - but that is the sort of answer I was looking for. Most folks wind up somehow disqualifying one of these AOP .Net alternatives and so I am looking for the ones which are unqualified "ready". I am definitely including NAspect in my list now. Sorry again, it is Very hard just looking at all these alternatives to properly differentiate them. owen ________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roger Johansson Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 10:30 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [aosd-discuss] More on AOP for .NET Hi, Can you define "production envitonment usage" ? For example , We use NAspect in our O/RMapper NPersist for lazy load, dirty tracking and databinding support etc etc. And NPersist is very much in production environments. so every app that uses NPersist is aspect oriented, atleast at domain model level. We have about 1000 downloads on the puzzleframework each month and the biggest NPersist application that I know of has around 150K users. So when can one consider it "used in production environment" ? regards, //Roger _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe and change options, go to: http://aosd.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss_aosd.net Check out the AOSD.net Wiki: http://aosd.net/wiki