Re: getting a more complex aspect from simpler ones....

In my research on "symmetric" approaches, this was often done, because
in those approaches the system is a composite module which is the
result of the composition of other modules, which are the result of
the composition of smaller modules, and so on, thus forming a
"hierarchy" of modules from the simplest (the "primitive" ones) to the
most complex (the composite ones). Those composition issues appeared
all the time when I was developing my software prototype.
Read papers about approaches such as Hyper/J and AHEAD (the latter is
an approach for Feature-Oriented Programming). You will find a lot of
information there.

I hope this helps.

Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues

On 10/23/06, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>    Some time ago, I have exchanged some emails with Dr. Pawlak and other
> researchers about some aspect composition issues.
>
>    The main idea is get two or more aspects composed in order to form
> another one more complex (i.e. a+b=c).
>
>    Let me try to be a little bit more clear: the idea is to get an
> example of two aspects that are composed in order to form/build another
> one more complex. One example would be:
>
>    Persistence (a) + Distribution (b) = Replication (c)
>
>    So, what do you think about that? Where can I find out more examples
> where this approach has been somehow applied?
>
>
> Regards,
> Fabio
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list    -    [email protected]
>
> To unsubscribe and change options, go to:
> http://aosd.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss_aosd.net
>
> Check out the AOSD.net Wiki: http://aosd.net/wiki
>

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list    -    [email protected]

To unsubscribe and change options, go to:
http://aosd.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss_aosd.net

Check out the AOSD.net Wiki: http://aosd.net/wiki