Re: Inheritance hierarchies
"Ashley at Metamaxim" <[email protected]> Tue, 17 Apr 2007 07:58:47 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.aspect.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <004501c780bd$d937de40$4001a8c0@Ashley> |
Hi Our research on behavioural aspects suggests that a mixin paradigm is better suited to aspect based modelling than an inheritance hierarchy (see www.metamaxim.com/download/documents/AOSD.pdf ). I think that the fundamental issue is that aspects are compositional. The inheritance paradigm suits refinement and the mixin paradigm suits composition. Best regards Ashley ----- Original Message ----- From: Donisthorpe C (AT) To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 4:16 PM Subject: [aosd-discuss] Inheritance hierarchies Hi I think system aspects can adversley impact software design by creating unique inheritance hierarchies from original crosscuts. This effect could originate from system-level crosscut influences and contaminate the lower-level software design. Q. Under these circumstances, how does EA analysis cater for system level aspects? Regards Charles ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe and change options, go to: http://aosd.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss_aosd.net Check out the AOSD.net Wiki: http://aosd.net/wiki _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe and change options, go to: http://aosd.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss_aosd.net Check out the AOSD.net Wiki: http://aosd.net/wiki