Re: Inheritance hierarchies

"Donisthorpe C \(AT\)" <[email protected]> Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:09:00 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.programming.aspect.general
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Raffi
 
I think you make a good point.  
I think this is one of the reasons that early-aspect analysis (EA) needs to have a design framework in place before it becomes effective.
 
 
Regards
 
Charles
 

________________________________

From: [email protected] on behalf of Raffi Khatchadourian
Sent: Tue 17/04/2007 15:49
To: Ashley at Metamaxim
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [aosd-discuss] Inheritance hierarchies



Ashley,

On Tue 17.Apr'07 at  7:58:47 +0100, Ashley at Metamaxim wrote:
>
>I think that the fundamental issue is that aspects are compositional. The inheritance paradigm suits refinement and the mixin paradigm suits composition.

But how are aspects compositional? The problem with reasoning about AO
programs is that doing so generally requires whole-program analysis.

--
Raffi Khatchadourian
Graduate TA Lecturer/Researcher
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
The Ohio State University
http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~khatchad

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list    -    [email protected]

To unsubscribe and change options, go to:
http://aosd.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss_aosd.net

Check out the AOSD.net Wiki: http://aosd.net/wiki

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list    -    [email protected]

To unsubscribe and change options, go to:
http://aosd.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss_aosd.net

Check out the AOSD.net Wiki: http://aosd.net/wiki