Re: "Around" advice
Pascal Costanza <[email protected]> Wed, 23 May 2007 20:55:57 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.aspect.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 23 May 2007, at 15:52, Eric Bodden wrote: > On 23/05/07, vamsidhar sharma <[email protected]> wrote: >> I found examples where the return value is being modified before >> sending it or pointcut excution is made conditional. Didn't find >> anything more real than these. > > Another way to us around-advice is to generate a closure that kind of > holds the continuation of the execution and can then be invoked later > on (see Laddad's book "AOP in action"): > > Object around(): pc() { > runnables.add(new Runnable() { > public void run() { > return proceed(); > } > }); > return null; > } > > I have used this technique in a similar way to implement a fault > tolerance layer. This indeed smells like a full continuation, but I can't imagine how this would work in a JVM. What am I missing? Pascal -- Pascal Costanza, mailto:[email protected], http://p-cos.net Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Programming Technology Lab Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel, Belgium _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe and change options, go to: http://aosd.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss_aosd.net Check out the AOSD.net Wiki: http://aosd.net/wiki