Some thoughts and questions...

--===============1791031899534495461==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1858797810-1228869194=:90968"

--0-1858797810-1228869194=:90968
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,
=A0
=A0=A0 This question is for general discussion. I was sitting at work durin=
g=A0after hours pondering stuff and surfing the net, and remebered that I w=
as on your mailing list. I have not spent the time that I should reviewing =
AOP, AOSD, and AspectJ. Life and work have not allowed, however, I read man=
y on the seminal articles and am absolutely fascinated at this maturing for=
m of SOC.
=A0
=A0 I am only am amater mathematician lacking any savviness or sophisticati=
on. If it cannot be proven by direct proof, I am often baffled, and do not =
ask a three column proof of me. However, in my reading of many of the early=
 AOP papers, I sense that aspects solve a topological problem and that SOC =
is uniquely an issue of resolving concern geometries.
=A0
=A0As I said I am horrible at the concrete mathematical details, however, I=
 can happily philosophise and wave my hands all day. Aspects effectively un=
link concern geometries which interfere with each other by providing anothe=
r logical dimension. However, it seems they cannot only interfere with each=
 other as links in a metal chain do. They can also share some of the same s=
ubstance such as the twist of a breaded pretzel of glazed donut. Would anot=
her logical dimension that allows for the proper encapsulation and sorting =
of this common concern substance when needed be of any benefit?
=A0
Thanks for your time, I hear a large eclair calling my name.
=A0
J
=A0=0A=0A=0A      
--0-1858797810-1228869194=:90968
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;"><DIV>Hello,</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;&nbsp; This question is for general discussion. I was sitting at work during&nbsp;after hours pondering stuff and surfing the net, and remebered that I was on your mailing list. I have not spent the time that I should reviewing AOP, AOSD, and AspectJ. Life and work have not allowed, however, I read many on the seminal articles and am absolutely fascinated at this maturing form of SOC.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp; I am only am amater mathematician lacking any savviness or sophistication. If it cannot be proven by direct proof, I am often baffled, and do not ask a three column proof of me. However, in my reading of many of the early AOP papers, I sense that aspects solve a topological problem and that SOC is uniquely an issue of resolving concern geometries.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;As I said I am horrible at the concrete mathematical details, however, I can happily philosophise and wave my hands all day. Aspects effectively unlink concern geometries which interfere with each other by providing another logical dimension. However, it seems they cannot only interfere with each other as links in a metal chain do. They can also share some of the same substance such as the twist of a breaded pretzel of glazed donut. Would another logical dimension that allows for the proper encapsulation and sorting of this common concern substance when needed be of any benefit?</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Thanks for your time, I hear a large eclair calling my name.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>J</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV></td></tr></table><br>

      
--0-1858797810-1228869194=:90968--


--===============1791031899534495461==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list    -    [email protected]

To unsubscribe and change options, go to:
http://aosd.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss_aosd.net

Check out the AOSD.net Wiki: http://aosd.net/wiki

--===============1791031899534495461==--