Re: Aggregates with dependencies
"Christopher Cornacchia " <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.domain-driven-design |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
What does that mean: "treat it like meta-data"? How are you supposed to treat meta-data? Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T -----Original Message----- From: Willem van Gool <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:43:28 To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [domaindrivendesign] Aggregates with dependencies Greg, Dan, I'm with you on this. It sounds like a typical security/principal case where the security context is constructed by querying some authorization service. Other than that, once you have the necessary info, treat it is meta-data... On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Dan Haywood <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: +1 On 15 February 2013 08:22, Greg Young <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: I would add the user not as part of the event but as metadata describing the event. It is very common to include context information in metadata (such as security context or machine that did it etc). Greg ------------------------------------