Re: What's goin on with the actors and DDD?
"michaelvodep" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.domain-driven-design |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hmm. My answer got lost ... Once more (my opinion about actors): Actors are about concurrency and not messaging. Its more a theoretical thing (like a turing machine) rather than practical stuff. So in case of Aggregates (havent watched the tutrials you postited): the only thing you can avoid is, if multiple instances try to update a specific aggregate, applying a actor model - your are safe of race conditions without using traditional synchronisation mechanisms (e.g. locks). But as I said - messanging, persistence, ... is not the main part of the actor ... BR Michael --- In [email protected], "guterfluss" <guterfluss@...> wrote: > > anyone? > ------------------------------------