Re: Is IoC containers harmful for DDD?

"Rikard Pavelic [email protected] [domaindrivendesign]" <[email protected]> Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:27:58 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.programming.domain-driven-design
Organization N.G.S.
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 03:41:52 -0800
"Greg Young [email protected] [domaindrivendesign]"
<[email protected]> wrote:

> I would still have issues with the bootstrap method, but thats
> whole other discussion (and goes against some of the DDD values).
> 
> I'd love to hear which DDD values it goes against.
> 

No, I think your bootstrap is perfectly aligned with DDD.
I meant that my values are sometimes not aligned with DDD way.

I've dealt mostly with systems where extensibility trumps DDD (and by
extensibility I don't mean XML, but only to be able to introduce new
functionality/change existing one without recompiling the existing
code). To be clear, I'm not talking about runtime configuration based
on configuration files, but about plugin based architectures.

Thus I dislike some of the preachings of DDD practitioners (I can
explain more if someone is interested) which are preferring closed
systems instead of open ones.

Regards,
Rikard

-- 
Rikard Pavelic
https://dsl-platform.com/
http://templater.info/


------------------------------------
Posted by: Rikard Pavelic <[email protected]>
------------------------------------


------------------------------------

Yahoo Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
    https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/