Re: Is IoC containers harmful for DDD?
"Rikard Pavelic [email protected] [domaindrivendesign]" <[email protected]> Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:27:58 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.domain-driven-design |
|---|---|
| Organization | N.G.S. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 03:41:52 -0800 "Greg Young [email protected] [domaindrivendesign]" <[email protected]> wrote: > I would still have issues with the bootstrap method, but thats > whole other discussion (and goes against some of the DDD values). > > I'd love to hear which DDD values it goes against. > No, I think your bootstrap is perfectly aligned with DDD. I meant that my values are sometimes not aligned with DDD way. I've dealt mostly with systems where extensibility trumps DDD (and by extensibility I don't mean XML, but only to be able to introduce new functionality/change existing one without recompiling the existing code). To be clear, I'm not talking about runtime configuration based on configuration files, but about plugin based architectures. Thus I dislike some of the preachings of DDD practitioners (I can explain more if someone is interested) which are preferring closed systems instead of open ones. Regards, Rikard -- Rikard Pavelic https://dsl-platform.com/ http://templater.info/ ------------------------------------ Posted by: Rikard Pavelic <[email protected]> ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------ Yahoo Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to: https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/