Re: Domain Event Objects vs Standard Events

"Rikard Pavelic [email protected] [domaindrivendesign]" <[email protected]> Thu, 28 May 2015 00:11:46 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.programming.domain-driven-design
Organization N.G.S.
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 27 May 2015 12:10:32 -0700
"[email protected] [domaindrivendesign]"
<[email protected]> wrote:

> What's everyone opinion on using (assuming .NET) standard custom
> events as opposed to the traditional DDD way (static domain publisher
> class)? 

I use .NET events as extension point for aggregate root event
replayability. But, can't say I'm loving the concept.
Also, I would never say static domain event publisher is "traditional
DDD", since I consider that one of the bigger antipatterns, at least
when running on top of transactional DB.

>              consignee.Created +=
>                  (s, e) => deferred.Enlist(() => Bus.Publish(e));

The issue with this code (except static Bus.Publish) is that event is
tied to the instance. Not sure when this would be useful.

Regards,
Rikard

-- 
Rikard Pavelic
https://dsl-platform.com/
http://templater.info/


------------------------------------
Posted by: Rikard Pavelic <[email protected]>
------------------------------------


------------------------------------

Yahoo Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
    https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/