Re: Re: testing the domain model
"Caleb Cushing [email protected] [domaindrivendesign]" <[email protected]> Tue, 07 Jul 2015 22:19:43 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.domain-driven-design |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAHKNRGmMi_M6V2b2ERn5PCgkjmmUU--v8aCNpyE37CG0zx1TA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 5:10 PM Brian Sayatovic [email protected] [domaindrivendesign] <[email protected]> wrote: > I'll see if I can snag some samples at work tomorrow or later tonight. > cool. > Going roughly from memory... And this is a .NET system... We might have > something like this in our test setup: > > TestFixture fixture = new TestFixture(); > var firm = fixture.DefaultFirmFixture.DefaultFirm; > var matter = fixture.MatterFixture.CreateTestMatter("John", "Public"); > ... > service.BillFirmForMattwe(firm, matter); > ... > Assert.IsTrue(...); // some post condition > > Now one of the things that helped us tackle more domain testing was > applying Jimmy Nilsson's workspace pattern. The unit of work and > persistence boundary is abstracted in a way that our repository classes > exist in the domain and function just fine in tests. This is NOT an in > memory database or anything like that. There is no ORM in the domain or > test code. That's a rule we hold to purely. > yeah our entities didn't really require it. I mean they were hibernate based entities... but you could have tested most things without saving them. I think that it was just a mistake that someone decided to put "saves" into our test fixtures. thanks for the sample code it's helpful. -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.com