RE: Re: Sticking point

STEURS Stefan <[email protected]> Mon, 16 Dec 2002 14:05:29 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.programming.extreme-customering
Message-ID <5983E4DAC939D311B2F20008C7E62E7A0A400938@clsh01xch.sup.cfmu.eurocontrol.be>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charlie Poole [mailto:[email protected]]
> 
> Dale,
> 
> > > There's a clue in that last paragraph: if I don't ship 
> the software
> > > to the customer every iteration, how do I get feedback on the
> > > running system?
> > 
> > Invite the customer to your machine.
> 
> I can imagine software that runs on my machine and not yours.

Hey, but if it cannot run on mine, I cannot prove anything, while if it does
there is a chance it works on another machine as well.

See, think positively.  If I can show something that runs on my machine,
there is a positive statement.  You have "added value".
> 
> Just kidding, we don't have to imagine that, it happens all the time!

True.  But there are several issue.  It's not because it runs on yours that
it will run on mine ;-)
> 
> In a shrinkwrap environment, there's generally a requirement that
> the software run when installed on a newly set-up system with only
> certain things on it. There's generally also a requirement for an
> install program to do that setup.
> 
> So at least in that environment, I'm for creating the CD and 
> running the install as soon as it's available... and I think
> it's better to have it available pretty early in the process.

I think you need it early on but not necessarily continuously.
Why wouldn't an image of the CD on an FTP server be equally good?

> 
> This is similar in concept to quickly developing a version of
> the entire system that runs from beginning to end, but without
> some of the detailed featurs. The installation process is
> also part of the user experience and it really s*cks to get
> to the "end"  and find out you don't have a way to install.

But you don't need the CD, you only need the setup.exe (sorry for the
simplification)
> 
> In an IT environment, I'd expect some similar criterion to
> be applied. If you plan to distribute by handing out CDs,
> then exercise that. If it's web-based distribution, then
> get it set up early and test it.

What risk is there that an image of a filesystem cannot be burnt onto a CD?
Why is everyone so succesful in ripping Audio CDs (and DVDs).

I think I'm missing something but I don't know what.

> 
> Charlie Poole
> [email protected]
> www.pooleconsulting.com
> www.charliepoole.org
> 
Stefan/


____
 
This message and any files transmitted with it are legally privileged and intended for the sole use of the individual(s) or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by reply and delete the message and any attachments from your system. Any unauthorised use or disclosure of the content of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
 
Nothing in this e-mail message amounts to a contractual or legal commitment on the part of EUROCONTROL unless it is confirmed by appropriately signed hard copy.
 
Any views expressed in this message are those of the sender.


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get 128 Bit SSL Encryption!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/CBxunD/vN2EAA/xGHJAA/NhFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
extremecustomering-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/