Re: Six Sigma and XP Estimation / Planning
"Eric <poetengineer-/[email protected]>" <poetengineer-/[email protected]> Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:56:31 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.extreme-customering |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bill, Thanks for the introduction. I have to admit that I'm a complete novice in terms of XP, and I wonder if someone can help me with either a brief overview of XP and Extreme Customering, or perhaps a tutorial on it that I might be able to access on the web. I don't even understand yet the relationship between XP and Extreme Customering - whether these are synonyms, or whether Extreme Customering is part of XP or vice versa. I look forward to discussing the possible convergence of Six Sigma and Extreme Customering and/or XP, and I hope you will be patient with me as I try to gain familiarity with the concepts and terminology of XP. Best regards, Eric Maass --- In [email protected], "Bill Walton" <[email protected]> wrote: > We're joined now by a real Six Sigma guru. His name is Eric Maass. Eric is Director of Technology Strategy for Motorola's Wireless and Broadband Systems Group. At the same time, he is Chairman of the Six Sigma Black Belts Steering Committee for Motorola's Semiconductor Products Sector. He has a web page at http://www.geocities.com/ecmaass/ for anyone who wants to check out his CV. In a conversation with another 6S guru who hasn't had time to join us I was told "I think you hit the nail on the head. The future is really in a balanced mix of XP and Six Sigma." So I have some high hopes that, in talking with Eric, we may find that XP has an ally in 6S that could bridge some communication gaps with organizations that are doing 6S, or at least think highly of it, but who don't know as much about XP. > > I posed a question earlier about whether / to what extent XP would find support for it's estimating / planning practices in a Six Sigma environment. In particular, I'm wondering about the practice of committing to a velocity for iteration X that's equal to the velocity achieved in iteration X-1. As I said earlier, I have a feeling that could be perceived as "shooting low." I wonder if 6S's statistical underpinnings might recommend a different approach that wouldn't put any more pressure on the development team re: unrealistic committments but, at the same time, answer this question plus the question about whether / how many stories should be estimated and in the queue in case the team accomplishes more than initially committed in an iteration. I also tend to think XP's practice of picking a "best guess" at an initial velocity and then adjusting based on actual results (as opposed to trying to develop a long term timeline that will be difficult to adjust, etc.) may find support in 6S in the context of establishing a baseline. > > Eric is new to XP and has expressed a need to come up to speed on the practices and the terminology. I thought it would be best, since practices are evolving, since there seems to be some variation in practice, and since I'm still researching XP as opposed to actually doing it, to ask you guys to explain the estimating / planning practices you use. Or, if you like, I could explain it as I understand it from my readings and talking to you here and let you correct me as necessary. > > Best regards, > Bill ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get 128 Bit SSL Encryption! http://us.click.yahoo.com/CBxunD/vN2EAA/xGHJAA/NhFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: extremecustomering-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/