Re: Summing up and moving on (I hope)
"Glen B. Alleman" <[email protected]> Fri, 20 Dec 2002 17:57:05 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.extreme-customering |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>J. B. Rainsberger wrote: [snip] I guess I haven't seen it that way. I'm not saying that I think Glen has been doing the opposite, but I am saying that I haven't seen the intent. I probably need to read what Glen writes more carefully. J. B. Rainsberger [GBA] My last post contained some cleared thoughts. Here they are seperated. These are Business views of "agile" processes, not views from the development side of the house: (1) Managers and above need that hear a message that resonant with the experience and "felt need." Shouting that a new process will save their business will not likely be that message for the general population of C and B-Types (2) Business managers want software to show up on time on budget. Advanced delivery is a second order effect for them. It is a first order effect for developers and SQA folks, but in order to move this effect out to the general customer, on time on budget needs to be accomplished first. (3) The presence of an XP customer is part of the XP success. XP has little to say (getting better) about how to transform a customer into an XP customer. (4) Understanding, tailoring, and focusing the "marketing message" is a sign of a maturing process. This happened with TQM, Six Sig, BSC, "Change" processes, etc. All started as zealot processes and matured to broad based processes by transforming "their" message not transforming the listeners. (5) For any change to take place a "felt need" is first necessary. Without this need the message is left at the door. Once this need is felt, it must be "internalized," that is the need must be turned into an internal source of action. Arriving at the door with a solution for the need without an internal recognition that the need can be fulfilled "externally" leaves the message at the door again (not invited in). These concepts are at the core of any "service" based sales strategy. The buyer of "hard goods" can compare side by side products and prices. The buyer of a service or a process improvement, can only compare the product with the "felt need" through an intellectual absorption. This includes asking peers, observing others (bench marking), absorbing the message in words of the receiver not words of the sender... Glen B. Alleman Director, Program Management Office Kaiser-Hill LLC Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site Golden, Colorado [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> +1.303.966.5865 Office +1.303.994.0874 NexTel ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get 128 Bit SSL Encryption! http://us.click.yahoo.com/CBxunD/vN2EAA/xGHJAA/NhFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: extremecustomering-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/