Re: Digest Number 133
"Bill Walton" <[email protected]> Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:05:03 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.extreme-programming.adoption |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <031e01c3d865$0e8fd6b0$6401a8c0@dp2000> |
Saif Ahmad wrote: > The stated objectives are presumably a)to question the practice of using analogies to describe the software development processs b)to explore "if software development really just like hardware development" > > While there could be an interesting debate on the latter with respect to concept,approach,execution and management,I am wondering if there is a slight dichotomy in the stated objectives. I agree with your observation, but couldn't figure out a way to handle it more effectively than I did. But yes, the message I intended was a) We don't need to work by analogy. Software development is a Design/Development phase activity, but b) If you do 'need' to compare it to something, at least compare it to another Design/Development phase activity, preferably the one most like it - computer hardware Development/Development. > I would look forward to the subsequent articles.The stated objectives 1-6 in the posting are quite interesting and I would love to see how you develop the argument. Thanks. I look forward to your feedback and input. Best regards, Bill Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/xpAdoption/ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/