Re: Digest Number 133

"Bill Walton" <[email protected]> Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:05:03 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.comp.programming.extreme-programming.adoption
Message-ID <031e01c3d865$0e8fd6b0$6401a8c0@dp2000>
Saif Ahmad  wrote:
> The stated objectives are presumably a)to question the practice of  using
analogies to describe the software development processs b)to explore "if
software development really just like hardware development"
>
> While there could be an interesting debate on the latter with respect to
concept,approach,execution and management,I am wondering if there is a
slight dichotomy in the stated objectives.

I agree with your observation, but couldn't figure out a way to handle it
more effectively than I did.  But yes, the message I intended was
a) We don't need to work by analogy.  Software development is a
Design/Development phase activity, but
b) If you do 'need' to compare it to something, at least compare it to
another Design/Development phase activity, preferably the one most like it -
computer hardware Development/Development.

> I would look forward to the subsequent articles.The stated objectives 1-6
in the posting are quite interesting and I would love to see how you develop
the argument.

Thanks.  I look forward to your feedback and input.

Best regards,
Bill


 

Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/xpAdoption/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [email protected]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/