RE: agile & extreme
"Charlie Poole" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.extreme-programming.adoption |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
JB, > >> >> Basically my aim is: is there any principled retreat from full-on > >> >> extreme that > >> >> increases the chances of adoption, and still delivers a good > >> >> chunk of the value > >> >> (and would tend to lead to more extremity)? > >> > > >> >Nicely put. > >> > > >> >I think you've outlined what to me is the _only_ aspect of this > >> >agile versus extreme discussion that is actually useful to us in > >> >terms of fostering xp Adoption. > >> > > >> >I suggest we fast forward past any advocacy type discussions. > >> > >> One possibility: be as extreme as possible in one small part of > >> the organization. Be successful. If people don't ask questions, > >> then you likely won't get anywhere with anything you try. > > > >This makes sense in the context: "I work in an organization and I'd > >like to spread use of XP in that organization" but it doesn't > >work for all of us. It's still a great approach, but the reason > >some of us are looking for a less-extreme way to phase things > >in is that we're trying to hook clients on XP, not employers. > > Well, I certainly don't have the same level of experience hooking > clients on XP, compared to employers, since I have worked much > more as an employee than as a direct service provider. > > Still, assuming that your client is just part of a larger > organization, then the only difference is that you don't work for > your client yet. Once you do, the likelihood is that the > situation will be quite similar, leading to the possibility of > expanding your market to more parts of that larger organization. I guess what I'm saying is that an outsider - unless brought in for the specific purpose of doing XP - may have less ablility to go all the way to extreme than a well-connected insider. > >> Has anyone demonstrated success using XP in some corner of their > >> organization, not had people ask questions but still feel that > >> the greater organization would be receptive to change? > > > >Not sure just what you mean here. > > My hypothesis is this: > > If you are successful and people see your success, but aren't > interested in how you did it, then those people are generally not > receptive to change. Ah... well that makes sense from my experience. How to use this observation is stil the question I'm wondering about. Charlie Poole [email protected] www.pooleconsulting.com www.charliepoole.org ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Turn flat surfaces into speakers with the Soundbug. http://us.click.yahoo.com/QWAVSC/onCFAA/xGHJAA/nhFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/