RE: agile & extreme

"Charlie Poole" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.programming.extreme-programming.adoption
Message-ID <[email protected]>
JB,

> >> >> Basically my aim is: is there any principled retreat from full-on 
> >> >> extreme that
> >> >> increases the chances of adoption, and still delivers a good 
> >> >> chunk of the value
> >> >> (and would tend to lead to more extremity)?
> >> >
> >> >Nicely put. 
> >> >
> >> >I think you've outlined what to me is the _only_ aspect of this
> >> >agile versus extreme discussion that is actually useful to us in 
> >> >terms of fostering xp Adoption.
> >> >
> >> >I suggest we fast forward past any advocacy type discussions.
> >> 
> >> One possibility: be as extreme as possible in one small part of 
> >> the organization. Be successful. If people don't ask questions, 
> >> then you likely won't get anywhere with anything you try.
> >
> >This makes sense in the context: "I work in an organization and I'd
> >like to spread use of XP in that organization" but it doesn't 
> >work for all of us. It's still a great approach, but the reason
> >some of us are looking for a less-extreme way to phase things
> >in is that we're trying to hook clients on XP, not employers.
> 
> Well, I certainly don't have the same level of experience hooking 
> clients on XP, compared to employers, since I have worked much 
> more as an employee than as a direct service provider.
>
> Still, assuming that your client is just part of a larger 
> organization, then the only difference is that you don't work for 
> your client yet. Once you do, the likelihood is that the 
> situation will be quite similar, leading to the possibility of 
> expanding your market to more parts of that larger organization.

I guess what I'm saying is that an outsider - unless brought in
for the specific purpose of doing XP - may have less ablility
to go all the way to extreme than a well-connected insider.
 
> >> Has anyone demonstrated success using XP in some corner of their 
> >> organization, not had people ask questions but still feel that 
> >> the greater organization would be receptive to change?
> >
> >Not sure just what you mean here.
> 
> My hypothesis is this:
> 
> If you are successful and people see your success, but aren't 
> interested in how you did it, then those people are generally not 
> receptive to change.

Ah... well that makes sense from my experience. How to use
this observation is stil the question I'm wondering about.

Charlie Poole
[email protected]
www.pooleconsulting.com
www.charliepoole.org




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Turn flat surfaces into speakers with the Soundbug.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/QWAVSC/onCFAA/xGHJAA/nhFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.