RE: Managing Extreme Programming
"Dinwiddie, George" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.extreme-programming.adoption |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dan Rawsthorne said: > I understand that this is what you want. My point is that doing XP > makes it impossible to do it. Doing BCWP and ACWP analysis presumes > an upfront knowledge of both scope and budget. This concept is > antithetical to the concepts of XP. So, management will do it if > they want to, but you have to know that either the "XP-ness" of > the project will go away, or the numbers will be bogus... Dan ;-) The BCWS analysis is pre-XP. It's done by higher-level managers when they're trying to justify the creation of the project. The ACWP and BCWP numbers get derived from that, and measured values. Though BCWS makes upfront presumptions about scope and budget, BCWP and ACWP don't make further such presumptions. In fact, they may be used to test those presumptions against the real-world measured values. Or so it seems to me. - George ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Flexible Keyboard is the ideal accessory for PDA users that are on the move. http://us.click.yahoo.com/dCBVZC/WnCFAA/xGHJAA/nhFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/