Re: Move from Tradition to XP - Jan 17th
Sandy <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.extreme-programming.adoption |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Ron Jeffries wrote: > Why do they want to do detailed design documents? > Why do they imagine that doing XP would make them stop? I should qualify "design documents". Their view of a design doc is low level, implementation detail design. Way beyond stories or a classic "requirements document". They historically used this time as a catch-all for things like prototyping, new technology research, etc. but always had a difficult time to justify that sort of work in the schedule. It took some "double loop" NLP to pull that out of them. Interesting. I believe they view XP's concept of "design enough" as "don't design, just start coding". I'm trying to give the analogy of the huddle in football. Quickly call a play in order to give everyone simple instructions and execute. Revise the plan on the next huddle. Don't try for the hail-mary on your own 20 yard line. [[insert your football analogy here]] -Sandy __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Flexible Keyboard is the ideal accessory for PDA users that are on the move. http://us.click.yahoo.com/dCBVZC/WnCFAA/xGHJAA/nhFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/