RE: Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP?
"Dan Rawsthorne" <[email protected]> Wed, 5 Feb 2003 09:29:55 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.extreme-programming.adoption |
|---|---|
| Organization | Net Objectives |
| Message-ID | <00b801c2cd3c$35718880$0302a8c0@drdanxp> |
I think that this visibility to upper management is specifically the job of the CustomerTeam. The higher the level of ceremony in the organization, the "thicker" the CustomerTeam. They insulate the team's developers from this ceremony (explicitly stated in Scrum), and so must provide it themselves. IMHO, Some specific tasks the CustomerTeam has are: - eliciting, analyzing, and documenting requirements with Users - Validating Release Plans with management. - extracting user stories from these requirements to "feed" the team and provide maximum ROI against the requirements validated by management - validating the system with users in order to determine what to do in the next release - requirement change management - etc. At the risk of being crass and commercial, take a look at http://www.netobjectives.com/courses/c_ad_intro_hi_c_org.htm for more discussion of what I think about this. Dan ;-) Dan Rawsthorne, PhD, Sr. Consultant www.netobjectives.com [email protected] office: 425-641-0814 Net Objectives' vision is effective software development without suffering. Our mission is to assist software development teams in accomplishing this through a combination of training and mentoring. -----Original Message----- From: Jim Standley [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 4:46 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [xpAdoption] Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really need to know about XP? I wouldn't have thought XP was meant to have a lot of visibility to upper management. "Agility" focuses on developers and their immediate customers and it enables a lot of good things at those levels. Upper management dealing with annual budgets is likely to approve a proposal from a business manager to reduce costs by implementing a new system to do some process with healthy ROI and not worry much about how it's done. They might be interested in process when we have more satisfied customers. Or we deliver better, faster, cheaper. Or they change high-level priorities and truncate the project and discover we delivered value equal to the spend-to-date. It will be a good day when they stop by to ask "Hey, how did you do that? Can you do it again?" At 10:52 PM 1/26/03 -0500, you wrote: >Scott, > >What happens, though, when those upper managers are asking for budget >figures based on what's going to be delivered over the period of a year? I >suppose many organizations couldn't provide an accurate figure regardless of >methodology, but a group using XP at least would answer, "Well that >depends." That isn't something that would have "the suits" opening their >pockets, so I feel that at least a little education is required. > >Dave Rooney >Mayford Technologies >http://www.mayford.ca > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Scott Worley <[email protected]> > > [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 10:44 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [xpAdoption] Do C-Level managers, and business drivers really > > need to know about XP? > > > > > > Hi all, a slightly diffrent tack of approach on the issue of XP > > Adoption. > > > > Do the high level managers in a company need to know about Agile this > > or XP that? > > > > In my opinion (I am a C-Level Manager) NO, what they/we want is > > results if its due to a new process that the dev team or indeed any > > other team is using, thier team lead/PM should know about it, but > > above that it is not necessary. A PM can request resource from > > higher management and in most cases the justification is of the > > standard Time/Cost/Resource type. A PM should act as a consultant to > > the teams they ENABLE and the management they provide a service for. > > > > I have worked at various levels in development over the past 10+ > > years, and in most cases the dev team I have been in, HAVE NOT TOLD > > the PM what exact process they follow :) including myself. > > > > Normally the time spent trying to educate people on process, is time > > we should have been coding, politics are fine when there is time. > > > > As a final note, I am not saying Senior management should not know > > what is being done process wise, just not in a low level and somewhat > > evangelistic way (btw: I am very evangelistic about agile process not > > just in development) > > > > Scott Worley > > CTO, Speaker, Consultant, Trainer, ENABLER of Process. > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > > > > >To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: >[email protected] > > > >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT <http://rd.yahoo.com/M=244396.2846622.4218523.2848452/D=egroupweb/S=1705 007207:HM/A=1414307/R=0/*https:/www.clearcredit.com/registration/default .asp?n=b&cpID=c01888p1379&ckID=gen14628> <http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=244396.2846622.4218523.2848452/D=egrou pmail/S=:HM/A=1414307/rand=303821244> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.