RE: Teams Leaders what are they, and do we need them? - Extension from Re: Re: Do C-Level managers, and business
"Steve Ropa" <[email protected]> Mon, 17 Feb 2003 13:26:35 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.extreme-programming.adoption |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Laurent Bossavit [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 1:14 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Teams Leaders what are they, and do we need them? - > Extension from Re: [xpAdoption] Re: Do C-Level managers, and business > > > > i've seen developers take advantage of managers with no > real technical > > experience, > > I would expect that a manager with real managerial experience would > not let herself be taken advantage of in that way... > > ...or at any rate, not twice. > > > and i've seen technical managers get in the way of the developers. > > Similarly, managers who "get in the way" hardly deserve the title. > DeMarco's Second Law of Bad Management... > > I've just thought of another difference between "managers" and > "leaders". You couldn't have a team composed only of managers, > because no one would do the work; but you might well have an all- > leader team. > > Cheers, > I would fear an all-leader team. The first time they want to go in separate directions, and of course instinctively expect everyone to follow... I also think the manager would be valuable(in this context) as we seem to be saying all of the administrivia and business oriented stuff would best be handled by a manager. Steve ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get 128 Bit SSL Encryption! http://us.click.yahoo.com/FpY02D/vN2EAA/xGHJAA/nhFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/