Re: Leadership and Management - is NOT about decision making or control, is it?
Dale Emery <[email protected]> Thu, 20 Feb 2003 15:07:29 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.extreme-programming.adoption |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Steve,
> When what the team sees as in its interest is at odds with what
> the larger organization sees as in its interest, the manager
> becomes the cheif arbiter. The expands the scope of the
> manager beyond ObstacleRemover.
Yes. This relates to my fuzzy notion that a manager has at least
two properties that leaders and obstacle removers may not. The
manager:
1. Is obligated to accomplish organizational objectives.
2. Is an authorized steward of organizational resources.
(I stole these properties, and probably paraphrased them, from
one of III's definitions. Definition of what? I don't remember.
Perhaps "project sponsor" or "authorizing player.")
Actually, every employee is an authorized steward of /some/
organizational resources. So I gotta distinguish managers from
non-managers somehow. The key distinction I see is that
managers' responsibilities include stewardship of a particular
resource: employees' agreements to provide services to the
organization.
Dale
--
E-mail: [email protected]
Web: http://www.dhemery.com
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get 128 Bit SSL Encryption!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/FpY02D/vN2EAA/xGHJAA/nhFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/