RE: Test

Jim,

Youre StoryProcess is - as you say - definitely not XP, but as a
step toward a more agile process from where you indicated you were,
it sounds pretty good. So what have been the reactions to this?
Where are you thinking of going next?

I'm agree with your DefectStories approach. Some defects may be
too small to be treated as a story by normal standards. You can
of course combine them to make a half-day or so worth. Another
approach is to merge them with some related new story.

Charlie Poole
[email protected]
www.pooleconsulting.com
www.charliepoole.org



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Standley [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 1:50 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [xpAdoption] Test
>
>
> Pretty quiet lately.  If you're really bored, see if this all sounds
> reasonable:
> http://www.surfscranton.com/Architecture/StoryProcess.htm.  The
> defect page
> http://www.surfscranton.com/Architecture/DefectStories.htm is new.
>
>
> At 12:25 PM 3/9/03 -0800, you wrote:
>
> >Wondering if this is working...
> >
> >Charlie
> >
> >
> >
> >To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >[email protected]
> >
> >
> >
> >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get 128 Bit SSL Encryption!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/xaxhjB/hdqFAA/xGHJAA/nhFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/