Re: Strange agile articles

"Massimo Manca [email protected] [extremeprogramming]" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.programming.extreme-programming
Organization Micron Engineering
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Il 12/10/2016 02:53, Robin Dymond [email protected]
[extremeprogramming] ha scritto:
>  
> OK Massimo, I did it. I read
> the http://prince2agile.wiki/An_Overview_of_PRINCE2_Agile
> <http://prince2agile.wiki/An_Overview_of_PRINCE2_Agile>
>
> I'd rather do SAFe, and that isn't a complement.
>
> Strange Agile indeed.
>
> First off they redefine Agile. Apparently the manifesto wasn't good
> enough.
>
>
>     PRINCE2 Agile's Definition of "Agile"
>
> PRINCE2 Agile prefers to ignore the simple definition of Agile as the
> use of adaptive lifecycles, and uses a popular description instead:
>
> /The term ‘agile’ is very broad and is viewed in many different ways
> throughout the agile community. There is a set of well-known
> frameworks referred to as ‘agile methods’ and there are also
> well-known behaviours, concepts and techniques that are recognized as
> characterizing the agile way of working. But there is no single
> definition of agile that accurately encapsulates them all, although
> the Agile Manifesto (see Figure 2.1) comes the closest to achieving
> this./ -- Official manual, Page 9
>
> /The term ‘agile’ when used on its own in this manual refers to a
> general family of behaviours, concepts, frameworks and techniques that
> is widely accepted throughout the agile community as being part of the
> agile way of working. The terms ‘behaviours, concepts, frameworks, and
> techniques’ also encapsulate other similar terms such as methods,
> principles, values, mind-sets and approaches./ -- Official manual, page 21
>
> This description, which can be reduced to "it's Agile when it's
> commonly referred to as Agile", is very risky for companies willing to
> become Agile by leading them to the wrong path, and creating poor results.
>
>
>     External Links
>
>   * Agile Practices Vs. Agile Methods
>     <http://mplaza.pm/agile-practices-vs-agile-methods/>
>   * Agile cannot be used in every project
>     <http://mplaza.pm/agile-cannot-be-used-in-every-project/>
>
>
>
>
> They have an Agilometer
> http://prince2agile.wiki/The_Agilometer
>
> They recommend fixed price fixed scope contracts and think adaptation
> (scope change) is bad
>
>     ...Then Work Packages
>     <http://prince2agile.wiki/Work_Package> would be the basis for
>     creating the release plans and iteration plans (Team Plans), while
>     their high-level aspects have been defined in the Project Plan and
>     Stage Plans from the beginning.
>
>     Delivery team members are empowered to decide on minor changes, as
>     long as they do not affect the Category:Management Products
>     <http://prince2agile.wiki/Category:Management_Products> directly.
>     Otherwise, the usual change control process would be run, with
>     escalations based ontolerances <http://prince2agile.wiki/Targets>.
>     Therefore, a limited level of adaptation exists in the delivery
>     layer, and higher-level adaptation would happen in the higher
>     layers, and specially in the Managing a Stage Boundary
>     <http://prince2agile.wiki/Managing_a_Stage_Boundary> Process.
>
>     The suggested approach in PRINCE2 Agile is to have fixed time and
>     cost for the project, similar to DSDM Atern. Consequently,
>     the contract <http://prince2agile.wiki/Contracts> would be
>     fixed-price. When the customer asks for a new feature, they have
>     to swap it for one (or more) of the initial features mentioned in
>     the contract, with the same size.
>
>     PRINCE2 Agile defines Agile <http://prince2agile.wiki/Agile> as a
>     set of behaviors and practices rather than the use of an adaptive
>     lifecycle, and consequently, the manual is focused on providing
>     generic guidelines on common behaviors in Agile environments
>     rather than providing a complete integration between the PRINCE2
>     process model and Agile lifecycle.
>
>
> OK, really bad taste in my mouth. I need to go gargle with Lagavulin.
>
> Thanks for that Massimo!
You welcome. Probably we didn't exchange so many opinions in the group
before but many times when I read articles or posts around the web about
"strange agile" and seems that I am the only thinking differently I stop
myself and post in the group what I find. Not because I need
confirmations (also if they are welcome) but to share the info with a
group of professionals I trust and appreciate their honesty in the
discussion. And prost!

Massimo
>
> Robin.
> 




---
Questa e-mail è stata controllata per individuare virus con Avast antivirus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------
Posted by: Massimo Manca <[email protected]>
------------------------------------

To Post a message, send it to:   [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: [email protected]

ad-free courtesy of objectmentor.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.