Re: Any advice on remote pairing?

There is still a pull request with both guys' names in the comment, and I
still read every line and run all the tests. It's just implicit that there
is less scrutiny.

On Tuesday, October 18, 2016, Ron Jeffries [email protected]
[extremeprogramming] <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> Adam,
>
> On Oct 14, 2016, at 6:13 PM, Adam Sroka [email protected]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>
> [extremeprogramming] <[email protected]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>>
> wrote:
>
> One thing that worked well for me was to say that all code checked in by
> one person had to be thoroughly code reviewed and accepted by me, but if
> you check it in as a pair I automatically accept it. I rejected the
> non-paired code about 50% of the time with good comments. Lots of work for
> me, but pairing went way up.
>
>
> “OK, Joe, I’ll say I paired with you if you’ll say you paired with me.”
> “OK, deal."
>
> Ron Jeffries
> ronjeffries.com
> I try to Zen through it and keep my voice very mellow and low.
> Inside I am screaming and have a machine gun.
> Yin and Yang I figure.
>   -- Tom Jeffries
>
> 
>