Re: [extremeprogramming] Pairing styles

"Mike Bowler" <[email protected]> Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:31:36 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.programming.extreme-programming
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> Over the years I noted a few more benefits, but also began to gather a list of "management overhead" elements that pairing incurred. When I started doing more mobbing, I realized that it generally eliminates of a lot of these concerns: troublesome pairings, context switching overhead (which does bring some positives), what to do with the odd pair, what to do with solo-dev'd stuff, etc. Nowadays I greatly prefer to mob, though I once again find that 6 hours is plenty.
> 
> I would never have guessed 20 years ago that mobbing would be easier to accept than pairing, given the common objections at the time. We talked about it at the XP Toronto user group and mostly dismissed it as a pipe dream. "If 2 is good, then surely 3 would be better...."


It’s surprised me as well. Mobbing appears to be less threatening and therefore people are more willing to give it a try.

Today, I often introduce mobbing first and then only later do I talk about pairing as a variant of that. 

Mike Bowler
Agile & Technical, Coach and Trainer
Cell: 905 409-7052
www.GargoyleSoftware.com/mike_bowler <http://www.gargoylesoftware.com/mike_bowler>
www.UnconsciousAgile.com

Ask about our Certified Scrum Developer (CSD) training classes <http://www.gargoylesoftware.com/training/csd>. In-house and public classes available.


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#160130): https://groups.io/g/extremeprogramming/message/160130
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/39413621/2417047
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/extremeprogramming/leave/4902963/619838065/xyzzy  [[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-