Re: [extremeprogramming] Origin of term "standup"?
"George Paci" <[email protected]> Thu, 21 Nov 2019 14:23:31 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.extreme-programming |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/18/19 12:52 PM, Tim Ottinger via Groups.Io wrote: > Status meetings can be done via tools. > > I don’t need to hear “i worked on 4534 after finishing 4640 yesterday. > Today I’ll be working on 4534 some more. No blockers” > I worked at a place ten years ago where we were in the habit of referring to stories by number in the standup. Then we realized that was an excellent way to provide the *appearance* of useful communication, without any *actual* useful communication. Nobody's recollection of a gotcha in the SRV module is going to be jogged by hearing "4534", but it would be for "Today I'll be working on the service ring-back part, which touches the SRV and DTB modules". And yeah: no need to hit every story on the board, just the ones we might be able to make progress on (given our WIP limits and other constraints). —George All it takes to fly is to hurl yourself at the ground... and miss. - Douglas Adams -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#160290): https://groups.io/g/extremeprogramming/message/160290 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/56090734/2417047 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/extremeprogramming/leave/4902963/619838065/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-