Re: why malloc/free instead of GC?
Enrico Weigelt <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.garbage-collection.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 03:11:07PM +0100, Juergen Christoffel wrote: > Yes, generational GC for example. > > Back in the eighties and early nineties, when Symbolics introduced > generational GC on their Lisp Machines, large programs did run faster with > GC turned on than without GC when the "Ephemeral GC" (that was their name > for Generational GC, IIRC) was turned on because this reduced working sets. How does this one work ? cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux ITS Webhosting ab 5 EUR/Monat. UUCP, rawIP und vieles mehr. phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.metux.de/ fax: +49 36207 519932 email: [email protected] cellphone: +49 174 7066481 smsgate: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- Diese Mail wurde mit UUCP versandt. http://www.metux.de/uucp/