Re: why malloc/free instead of GC?

Enrico Weigelt <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.programming.garbage-collection.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 01:58:07PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:

<snip>
> Same way generational GC copes with it, i.e., through write barriers.
> However, when I said "separate entities", I meant mostly "independent
> heaps", in which case there won't be any cross-references.
Ok, so the programmer has to make sure, that these two pools are 
strictly separate. hmm. 
This is almost the same like the pooled allocator of the apache2.

cu
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Enrico Weigelt    ==   metux ITS 
 Webhosting ab 5 EUR/Monat.          UUCP, rawIP und vieles mehr.

 phone:     +49 36207 519931         www:       http://www.metux.de/     
 fax:       +49 36207 519932         email:     [email protected]
 cellphone: +49 174 7066481	     smsgate:   [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Diese Mail wurde mit UUCP versandt.      http://www.metux.de/uucp/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.