RE: Another Perspective on the Cause of the Keyhole Problem

I think one of the points of this list is to be more cautious than this.
You can say what you're saying about just about anything.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Heaney [mailto:[email protected]]=20
Sent: November 10, 2003 7:45 AM
To: Software Keyholes
Subject: RE: [SK] Another Perspective on the Cause of the Keyhole
Problem

My advice is to just write the book you want to write.  If someone is
offended by your argument, then too bad for them. =20

If you think you're right, then don't apologize for it.  Put it out
there and the market will settle the matter.

Regards,
Matt




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Meyers [mailto:smeyers-Q9ZaqOuDrMJWk0Htik3J/[email protected]]=20
> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 8:25 PM
> To: Software Keyholes; Software Keyholes
> Subject: Re: [SK] Another Perspective on the Cause of the=20
> Keyhole Problem
>=20
>=20
> At 01:30 PM 11/7/2003, Jill Huchital wrote:
> >There's no flaw in the logic. But it should be
> >presented as the inevitable conclusion to all the
> >other arguments you've presented in the chapter. "They
> >do, as, of course, they should." If the rest of the
> >chapter is strong, then the reader will be thinking
> >"Duh" rather than "Who does he think he is?"
>=20
> How can somebody say "Who does he think he is?" if the=20
> argument is compelling?
>=20
> Sigh.
>=20
> That was a rhetorical question.  Sometimes compilers are so=20
> much more reasonable than people.
>=20
> Scott
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> software-keyholes mailing list software-keyholes-xIg/pKzrS18HpDbxM/[email protected]
> http://artima1.inetu.net/mailman/listinfo/software-keyholes
>=20
_______________________________________________
software-keyholes mailing list
software-keyholes-xIg/pKzrS18HpDbxM/[email protected]
http://artima1.inetu.net/mailman/listinfo/software-keyholes