Re: A New Keyhole Type!
Scott Meyers <smeyers-Q9ZaqOuDrMJWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> Thu, 25 Aug 2005 19:01:17 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.keyholes |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 01:43 PM 8/25/2005, Hendrik Schober wrote: > to be modal.) OTOH, I can think of a reason to not > allow the opposite: Suppose you open the "Print" > dialog, and enter that you want to print page 2-7, > then open the "Open" dialog and open a document > with only one page. The same thing that would happen if you opened a one-page document, clicked Print, then specified pages 2-7. I don't see the problem. But that's not the issue. The issue is that modal dialogs are a keyhole and, as such, we should look for alternatives, taking into account the pros and cons of each design when coming to a decision. Rather than talk about Print dialogs and what could or could not be (thus risking being blinded by what we are used to), I think a better example is the bookmark management window, which is modal under IE6 and modeless under Firefox. Now that we know that both are possible, we are in a better position to reason about their relative merits. Scott